Polarization in the Political System

On Tuesday, November 14, 1995, in what has been perceived as the years biggest non-event, the federal official establishment shut down whole non-essential services collectible to what was, for all intents and purposes, a game of national chicken amongst the house Speaker and the President. And, at an estimated cost of 200 million dollars a day, this dubious battle of dueling egos did not come cheap (Bradsher, 1995, p.16). because do politicians find it almost congenitally impossible to cooperate? What is it astir(predicate) governance and prop angiotensin converting enzyment that appear to always put them at odds with good giving medication activity? Indeed, is an effective, easily run government even possible given the watercourse adversarial relationship among our deuce main semi policy-making parties? It would seem that the exercise of power for its own sake, and a competitive cloud in which one side moldiness always guard the other on any issue, is incompatib le with the cooperation and compromise demand for the government to function. As the United States becomes more extreme in its beliefs in general, assemblage polarization and ambition, which requires a mutual exclusivity of determination attainment, will crown to more showdown situations in which the intention of good government gives way to political posturing and power-mongering. In this paper I will analyze recent political demeanour in terms of two factors: Group behavior with an emphasis on polarization, and competition. However, one should keep in head that these two factors argon interrelated.

Group po larization tends to exacerbate inter-group c! ompetition by impetuous any two groups who initially dissent farther isolated in their respective views. In turn, a competitive situation in which one side must lose in order for the other to win (and political situations are well always competitive), will codify the differences between groups - leading to just extremism by those seeking power at heart the group - and thus, to further group polarization. In the above example, the two main combatants, plug-in Clinton and Newt Gingrich, were virtually forced to take uncompromising, disparate views because of... If you deficiency to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper